Why not? What are reasons not to?
-
-
-
No reasons not to. We should join tomorrow.
-
Are there any discussions in public about it? Any parties that have it as a goal ?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If
want save their sovereignty shouldn't do this Develop ur army yourself.Do not throw yourself under the influence of another counties. -
Conclude military alliances but do not allow foreign armies to host in your territory.
-
And have technical dependence on other countries. NATO membership De facto assumes both influences
-
Sweden had all that during the cold war. It is extremely expensive and hardly possible in today's technological world.
-
For you money is more important than sovereignty? Sweden used to be great long years ago. And now? What a feeling of helplessness??!!!

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A general rule is: do exactly the opposite of what Putin wants you to do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now that they're part of the caliphate and rape capital of the western world?
-
Yes...what a hell hole.....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@little7bear Eactly right - that's the only healty proer attitude!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Long time overdue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sweden was wise enough to be avoiding all major wars on the continent since 1709. but new times bring new challenges. requires proper answer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder what the swedes think of merkal dissing the president
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
simple task for a man
@daveo515 rearrange movies@USFDA@SpeakerRyan@1200CreativeInn@BernieSanders#3hrsOnASunday
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
