Trump still would have won. The numbers were not close. Trump won with the message resonating with Americans.
-
-
-
Okay. I can accept that but this is about the Russian interference. Equally bad if Trump won because of it or not.
-
Trump worked tirelessly from 1 rally to the next. HRC could never do rallies, she has no stamina... only sm. crowds
-
Okay. I don't care much. Russia meddled in the election. Don't matter much what effect it had. Matter that Russia did.
-
we have been trying to meddle in Russian politics to remove Putin. Do you think that is right? Americans are not virgins
-
So what? One crime never justifies another.
-
I agree... point is regardless HRC lost the election herself. She might have won but she was never strong enough in debates
-
Okay, okay. Clinton was not a winner. Fine.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
no one voted for Trump due to the Russians. They despised Hillary, and for good reasons.
-
Podesta emails didn't change the mind of one single voter?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well said.
-
Thanks Alonzo!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He would have done.The alternative wasn't much better.The great nation offered two dodgy candidates.
-
Sure did but the point here is Russia's actions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
anyway, US elections compromised thus not legit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AKimCampbell The root issue isn't the "hack". It's the dearth of critical thinking amongst the electorate.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
democrats blaming putin for trump is like russians blaming obama for garbage on streets. they do more damage than any good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
