Why does Russia has that seat?
-
-
-
That is beyond my comprehension. Russia should have been kicked out of all international organisations long ago.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nukes, probably.
-
It was the victory in WWII that settled it, before the nukes. India also has nukes.
-
Yes I know they do - I was not suggesting they dont deserve a seat, only saying why (IMO) the UK still has one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
security council has no place in 2016
-
Yeah, that's sound logic. Kick out the UK but keep Russia. Good luck with that.
-
or you know . . . come up with something that actually functions in a reasonable way
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
seems like the uk may cease to exist. scotland and n. ireland are saying they want to stay in the eu.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t know about India and Brazil as replacements but the UK needs to go
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even more so, within a few years: "why has England..."
@samueloakfordThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@samueloakford so France off as well?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the UN SC has no place itself, it's time is over
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The UK must indeed be punished...for not being politically correct. No greater crime!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
