@andersostlund what's wrong with that? It is either subsidised agriculture or no agriculture.
-
-
-
@burgherreview Really? I would keep buying and eating food even if there where no subsidies. Would you go into starvation?
-
@andersostlund no, the point is that agricultural commodities are too cheap to recover overheads and interest. -> -
@burgherreview Of course not. The market will produce exactly what you need and are willing to pay for. That is why it is called "market".
-
@andersostlund "willing to pay for" is the most overlooked part of the definition. -
@burgherreview Why? We always pay exactly what we are willing to pay for every single product we buy. That is market economy and it works.
-
@andersostlund and when no one offers to sell at the price you offer to buy is market too. A dangerous combination when it comes to food. -
@burgherreview Not at all. You would have just the amount and kind of food produced that people want to buy. Market economy at work.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@andersostlund Oh, they not work like in medieval age? I am in shock. -
@fotogott I am not in shock but I question why they need subsidies. -
@andersostlund maybe afraid of loose work, all business plans contains subsidies. culture of demonstration in France/BLX is different
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@andersostlund Similar stuff some years ago in Slovenia.#poor#farmerspic.twitter.com/PVmBONErTw
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
