@andersostlund Didn't Guardian a while ago use "pro-Kiev" when referring to Ukraine government forces ...?
-
-
-
@MikkoLaaksonen1 They did and that is awful. -
@andersostlund@MikkoLaaksonen1 Painful to our ears: Ireland's@rtenews today virtually blamed UA forces & Poroshenko for everything!#sods
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@andersostlund Or 'pro-Kiev troops' rather than the Ukrainian Army!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@andersostlund Either that or just trying to fit more words in by using shorter ones, or avoid excessive repetition of the word Ukraine -
@gullivercragg you could just write UA government or just Ukraine. "Kiev(?? It's Kyiv) govt = Kremlin narrative.@andersostlund -
@murderotica_@andersostlund I shall no sooner write "Kyiv" than i would write "Roma". It is Kiev in English just as Paris is Paryzh in Ukr. -
@gullivercragg OK, pro-paris france backed pro-journalist, then I'll call you "dumbass" as that's what "gulliver" is spelled in English -
.
@gullivercragg Dumbass Cragg, the pro-paris france-backed pro-journalist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@andersostlund on CNN they recently used 'pro-US' forces. Wrong, weird and not professional style.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@andersostlund yes, they use formula: "government incompetent in..." + "x" where "x"=finances OR army operations OR foreign policy OR socialThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
