@CkohutW Because the onus is always on a democracy to show that it is better than tyranny. @andersostlund @shaunwalker7
-
-
@andersostlund We're not talking abt that, we're talking abt the Ukrainians who live under occupation@odessum @CkohutW@shaunwalker7 -
.
@CameronJJJ International law requires oqqupier to be responsible for ppl in occupied area@andersostlund@odessum @CkohutW@shaunwalker7 -
@a7_FIN_SWE Quite sure both sides have a duty not to impede the provision of assistance to civilian population. -
.
@CameronJJJ No duty to provide to enemy occupied area. Where on earth did you get that idea? It's a war out there! Not Sunday sports! -
@a7_FIN_SWE I "got that idea" from p.535 of this https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/irrc_855_stoffels.pdf … -
.
@CameronJJJ That discusses the need to get _occupier's_ consent for providing hum aid... There's no priniple of free movement over front -
@a7_FIN_SWE No. State authority on whose territory aid to be delivered. It's Ukraine's territory & is recognized thus. -
@CameronJJJ Passage discusses NGO's and such, not what Guardian wrote about. Se pic on authorization, page 534pic.twitter.com/StjMChoudI
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
