Repeating that saying "Adani" is "losing" really isn't an argument. @anatosaurus's logic on #StopAdani would say #NoKXL was losing.
-
-
En réponse à @Davidxvx @anatosaurus
It's about framing: if you use the terminology of what you're trying to change then you unintentionally reinforce it
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @GillKing01 @anatosaurus
I understand framing as a concept. I don't understand Anat's application of it to
#StopAdani.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
"StopAdani" and "NoKXL" might include fossil fuel companies' names, but they're still really our framing.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @Davidxvx @GillKing01
Momentum/collective & wins matter. But a "no" w/o a "yes" & "stop" w/o "start" aren't fwd motion. They're holding a bad status quo.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @anatosaurus @GillKing01
Where I question that is where your persuadables have already heard the "yes" over and over. NoXL and NoDAPL had implied yes-es.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Interesting pt. An empirical Q I'm afraid I don't have data to answer.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.