Long time listeners will know it's (a). (By 7 points in national survey this week.) Why? Cause B adopts the opposition's storyline and personifies economy, bringing top of mind nonsense about need to serve/protect it.
Afficher cette discussion
Which formulation about COVID garnered more agreement: (a) “dangerous threat that can kill even more people if not taken seriously” (b) “dangerous threat that can kill even more people and damage the economy further if its not taken seriously"? /1
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Corporations aren't people, and the economy isn't a person. Only people are people. I have to remind myself of that every day when I speak and write, but it makes one hell of a difference.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
B. People dont seem to realise stopping the spread benefits the economy in the long run. I.e if we had a lick down sooner , stricter and longer, introduced competent test, track and trace, not relaxed too soon we'd be coming out of all the restrictions sooner and rebuild economy
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.