How well do you know high potential voters? In RCT of 6000 which reluctant voters did this engage? a. Cynics (feel burned by system, don't believe change possible) b. Peace seekers (find politics a whole lotta yelling, prefer to focus on fam and friends) c. Bothhttps://twitter.com/WMTFAction/status/1314289011616296960 …
-
0:29Afficher cette discussion -
What about this one? a. Cynics b. Peace seekers c. Bothpic.twitter.com/DOcRYvPhlg
2 réponses 7 Retweets 25 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
And this? a. Cynics b. Peace seekers c. Bothpic.twitter.com/WduS2njouc
3 réponses 5 Retweets 13 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Anat Shenker-Osorio a retweeté Anat Shenker-Osorio
And now an admittedly tricky one:https://twitter.com/anatosaurus/status/1312868820738994176?s=20 …
Anat Shenker-Osorio ajouté,
2 réponses 3 Retweets 11 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
This one, unfortunately, only worked w already highly engaged and progressive respondents. People we don’t need to mobilize nor persuade. And, tbh, we suspected that. 1
2 réponses 2 Retweets 4 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion
Sharing anyway for this lesson: we’re not the audience & we must judge content on the basis of what works w targets not on ourselves. And I for one love this ad. :)
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
world is possible when we stand united.
Be a voter.