Don’t you think using anger as a motivator would activate an important segment of less policy-focused voter?
-
-
-
Anger is great. It's a catalyzing negative option (as opposed to fear which is an inhibiting one.) We can be angry he stole from us. But we need not imply we ought to angry/annoyed that we're suckers who paid. It's a subtle but vital diff.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Yeah, kinda agree. It would be better to see a list of all the things (roads, healthcare, consumer protections, etc.) that Trump businesses use and need to operate.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
- Voir les réponses
-
-
-
is he impugning tax? I would argue he is impugning those who seek to avoid/evade it. And people do have a reason to vote. A reason of the most vital importance imaginable.
-
Fair question. In my read yes but readily grant others view differently. However anti tax so embedded it’s easily triggered. Alt framing same tweet - how much more do you contribute than DT. But this is still making it anti him not pro JB.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
U DK. It's an empirical Q, if the ad is successful. It may be. I hope Dems pre-tested the ad. But Dems are usually science deniers re: messaging. Dems do badly @ messaging bc they don't empirically test. No 1 shd trust their instincts to come up w messaging & then fail to test it
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.