This is one of the most consistent & replicated findings both in current RCTs we’re doing and in real world examples of ending regimes like Trump’s.
Afficher cette discussion
You defeat autocrat by characterizing him as a weak loser, not an authoritarian strong man. The former activates “law and order” desire among swing & despair among high potential voters who see participating as lost cause.https://twitter.com/hunterw/status/1305870908003954690 …
-
-
-
There’s a reason Trump feminizes his opponents in order to denigrate them.
Afficher cette discussion -
Our issue in FL, as elsewhere, is that we need to give our Latino and other voters something to vote *for*. Negative ads on Trump don’t mobilize. And strongman ads on Trump don’t persuade.
Afficher cette discussion -
Caudillos have had a pretty good run in Latin America. All of them remained for many “terms” even doing away with real elections all together.
Afficher cette discussion -
If everyone would just watch “No” with
@GaelGarciaB we'd be better of in so many ways. You win by making people hunger for what can be not scaring them about what is.Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
right. it was "the emperor has *no* clothes" not "the emperor's clothes are actually bionic enhancements making him a demi-human god"
-
Thank you.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
In general, would be good if the media dropped the "strongman" characterization of governing by force. Nothing strong about it.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.