It is my fantasy that we have a Dem convention where we only ever say what we're for and what we'll do. Mostly, because this is what's proven to mobilize and persuade. But also because nothing would anger those we oppose more than us rendering them not even worth naming.
-
Actually, pollster
@RachelBitecofer has documented that negative partisanship is a powerful motivator for voters.
Super familiar with this rich work! Negative partisanship is absolutely where many *already engaged & decided* voters are. But for disaffected potential voters - negative messaging is measurably repellent. For fence sitters it can re-entrench views by activating defensiveness
-
-
Tons of testing - much of it field and/or task-based, not reliant on self-reporting. Just one examplehttps://www.vox.com/2020/6/9/21284758/broockman-kalla-biden-ads-trump-ads …
-
Interesting. Though Trump's poll numbers sure started dropping after
@ProjectLincoln & other Trump attack ads started filling up the Internet. - Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.