Keep in mind VC as an asset class is like two orders of magnitude smaller than hedge in AUM.
-
-
-
Right on!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cant say anything unless you adjust for AUM. PE and HF are much much bigger.
-
Cmon...say something
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think there are too many ‘on paper’ VCs that have invested as an angel in one or two local concerns and spend the rest of their time talking about how they are VC.
-
I believe these are VC firms who have filed with regulators
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No ... on the contrary, there arent enough. And careful wishing for micro VCs because they will be underfunded. And you likely left out family offices unless PE firms captures them.
-
True!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the capital were distributed in a way that made sense. Probably. But there are entire populations and demos getting left out of the funding conversation - so I’m all for MicroVCs if it means more diverse founders are getting a shot (even if it’s a smaller shot).
-
agree
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
There are ~600 VC firms
There are ~2,000 PE firms
There are ~10,000 Hedge funds
Are there too many VC funds?