Amara's Law  

@analyticascent

Decentralization and decriminalization. Cypherpunk. Interested in using machine learning to infer content and methodology of studies/news articles.

Disconnected
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2016.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @analyticascent

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @analyticascent

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    1. I'm going to collect tweets that are so good at describing the failed logistics of certain discussions that I know I'll scramble to find them later on if I don't keep them in one handy thread. Starting with this gem:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 18. sij

    Back to my partial hiatus. Lately I've been keeping better track of how to spend the three hundred or so hours of "discretionary" time I have each month. Now even a morning routine (shower & brush) that exceeds twenty minutes seems costly over time. 😄

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. sij

    Who benefits from encryption? Per : “women plagued by intimate-partner violence rely on it...Protesters and the persecuted...Businesses use it to protect sensitive communications...even governments use it to secure their own information from adversaries.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    With that said, I still agree with skeptics that the term "cancelled" is often used too loosely. 🤔

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    "Prove that cancel culture exists" Even though you've already been flooded with excellent examples, I think it's worth noting that what happened to is an especially underrated case of this:

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    Joe Biden's immensely dumb take on was bad enough for me to break my Twitter hiatus for the month. No one on either the left or right who wants to repeal it has any idea why it came to be, let alone what it actually does. 🙄

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    The Twitter block function, brought to us by Section 230(c)(2). A beautiful thing today.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    Section 230 is a short law, but it's complicated. So it's important to learn about its history and how it works. Read my book, of course! But if you're a reporter on a deadline, read this Q&A that I did with of The Verge:

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    Interesting. If the guidelines require searching private content, that could create some tricky Fourth Amendment agency issues.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Since when has "not causing harm" ever been enough to prevent lawsuits? Here's a small newspaper (with liability insurance) that was almost put out of business over a completely bogus lawsuit.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    Because as we all know, bogus lawsuits are *totally* never filed against the little guy in any situation... "Just get liability insurance" is no excuse for this. 🤨

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I'm absolutely shocked that a lawyer wants to remove a fundamental legal protection so they have more ways to sue people. Didn't see this coming at all. "Liability insurance, but for bad speech" 🤡

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    "Politicians don’t realize that a Section 230 repeal would cripple review sites like Yelp, short-term rental platforms like Airbnb, e-commerce sites like Etsy, general listings sites like Craigslist, and educational sites like Wikipedia."

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    Tech voters: not only does Joe Biden want to repeal , he also speaks fondly of .

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    Without Section 230, the inevitable perversion of defamation law as a privacy shield would be ruinous for the Internet and UGC as we know it. Just look to the current abuse of Copyright law as an ominous example. [].

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    So many proposals are a classic case of: Step 1: repeal 230 Step 2: ??? Step 3: the internet is now all unicorns and rainbows

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    Revoking is about as sensible as eating the stick holding a corn dog

    Poništi
  18. 18. sij

    Joe Biden's immensely dumb take on was bad enough for me to break my Twitter hiatus for the month. No one on either the left or right who wants to repeal it has any idea why it came to be, let alone what it actually does. 🙄

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    you guys all say you hate lawyers until you need our help navigating the extremely burdensome and unforgiving system we designed

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    "Andy works for Facebook so it's okay for people to lie about Section 230" is quite a take for a journalist to have, especially given your reliance on that law itself.

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Why is it that so many influential political figures have such horrifically stupid takes on CDA 230 and vow to dismantle the single most important law protecting free expression on the Internet – not just in the US, but (due to the US’s position) around the world?

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·