Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce analogist_net
James Wu
James Wu
James Wu
@analogist_net

Tweets

James Wu

@analogist_net

Engineer, neuroscientist. Building better neuroscience tools @WhiteMatterLLC. PhD from @UW @ctr4neurotech. He/him. Opinions my own. Every little thing matters.

Duwamish land
analogist.net
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2014.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    1. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Your motor commands zips down from your brain through α-motor neurons to your fingers at around 100 m/s. They move; your legs then feel that scratch slowly at 40 m/s through type II sensory fibers. That signal's roundtrip takes 40-50 ms to just travel through your body.

      1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 75 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    2. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      After the sensory signals process, 100-200 ms has passed - from intent to conscious sensation. For reference, that would be the network roundtrip time from the US west coast, all the way to Europe, *and back*.

      6 proslijeđenih tweetova 77 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    3. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Crazy thing is, if that happened in a game you're playing, you would complain about lag. But for scratching, you *don't feel it at all* - your brain hacked time perception backwards to make you think the movement intent, the movement, and the sensation occurred at the same time.

      11 proslijeđenih tweetova 115 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    4. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      This "hack sensations back in time" trick is also related to another effect - cancelling the sensations of your own actions. In movement neuroscience (and controls), this is the "efference copy". You expect the movement to feel a certain way, then you subtract that expectation.

      1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 71 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    5. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Subtracting the expected sensation from the actual one -- that is, paying attention to what *wasn't* unexpected -- is a great strategy for a lot of reasons, chief among them being that the brain doesn't have to waste as much energy paying attention when things are *going right*.

      1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 70 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    6. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Most people can't tickle themselves. Even using a tool, like a pen, it's very hard. Ever wondered why? One of the dominant reasons is that our movement efference copy is being canceled out, muting the feeling. But! That cancellation only works within about 150-200 milliseconds.

      1 reply 14 proslijeđenih tweetova 96 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    7. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      In a famous experiment in 1999, Dan Wolpert's lab built a robot. You moved the robot's arm, and another arm mirrored your movements, after an adjustable short delay. You could now in fact tickle yourself - as long as the robot copying your movements was delayed by about 200 ms.pic.twitter.com/u5d9gQc19n

      Tickling sensations using a robot that copied your movements is about the same as if someone else tickled you, after a 200ms delay.
      33 proslijeđena tweeta 165 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    8. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      This cause-and-effect hack works in other ways too. One of the ways it does so is in sensory integration. As we now know, if you see, hear, and feel what you think is same event, these signals are probably all hitting your brain at *very* different times.

      1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 66 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    9. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      So the brain tries its hardest to try to mix all of these senses together into what it thinks is the same event. One of the more famous illusions is the rubber hand illusion. Stare at a realistic rubber hand, and have someone touch IT - and your own hand - at the same time.

      1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 59 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    10. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      If your hand is hidden well enough, and the rubber hand is placed in a plausible position, and the two touches are at around the same time, many people start to feel like the rubber hand is part of their own body.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DphlhmtGRqI …

      1 reply 12 proslijeđenih tweetova 81 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
      James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      The word generally used is "ownership". It feels like it is part of you, because the sight of the touch, and the feel of the (separate) touch, are associated in your brain. If someone threatens the rubber hand with a knife, you flinch.https://www.the-scientist.com/infographics/infographic-the-rubber-hand-illusion-31592 …

      23:57 - 3. srp 2018.
      • 4 proslijeđena tweeta
      • 66 oznaka „sviđa mi se”
      • richard. TheMalanta Mike Fragassi Popeye Otaku Lex Lopez isak bøll tibi spacegoat🪐🐐 Lu Serrano
      1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 66 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        1. Novi razgovor
        2. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 3. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          It shouldn't be surprising to you know that this illusion starts fading if the two touches become separated by more than 200-300ms. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006185 …pic.twitter.com/tM945aFVGV

          Rubber hand illusion feedback delay: 200ms and the sensation disappears.
          1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 63 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        3. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          And if you're curious, our lab was looking into if this illusion works if you're stimulating the brain directly as well, by passing currents into the sensory cortex in patients with implanted electrodes. (Yes, it does.)http://www.pnas.org/content/114/1/166 …

          2 proslijeđena tweeta 62 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        4. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Just as @Foone pointed that the visual system isn't like a camera streaming high-res video back at you, but is full of inconsistencies like blind spots and and selectively high-res (foveal) regions, the same thing is true of the skin on your body.

          4 proslijeđena tweeta 54 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        5. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          A classic example of "tactile acuity" is 2-point discrimination, whether you can tell that 2 pinpricks are, in fact, from 2 different pins. Well, you might know that this is about a millimeter of acuity in your fingertip, and many centimeters on your torso. That's not bullshit.pic.twitter.com/rvb3HEHaxc

          2-point discrimination: ranges from very fine on fingertip, to very course on torso and calf.
          8 proslijeđenih tweetova 68 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        6. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          What is less well known is that this is affected by whether or not those pins touch simultaneously, or one after another. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ana.24179 … It's also affected by whether or not the pins cause pain. It's even affected by whether you have chronic pain.

          2 proslijeđena tweeta 43 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        7. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          What is probably most bullshit is that tactile resolution is improved by whether or not you're *looking toward* the general direction of the touch. EVEN IF YOU CAN'T SEE ANYTHING BECAUSE YOUR ARM IS IN COMPLETE DARKNESS.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096098220100327X …

          15 proslijeđenih tweetova 169 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        8. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          (A lot of this background -- and a lot of the ongoing work in neural touch perception at the @NeuralE_Ctr -- I learn from my colleagues @croninja1 and @djcald. Look for work from them.)

          1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 43 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        9. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          (Aside: while your 2-point acuity is ~1 mm, you can feel down to *nanometers* -- if you're allowed to stroke the texture. This is *awesome insane*, not *bullshit insane*. Basically, your brain turns the texture into a symphony of vibrating frequencies. http://www.pnas.org/content/110/42/17107.full …)

          1 reply 31 proslijeđeni tweet 142 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        10. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Another way your brain tries to blend vision and feel together is the size-weight and material-weight illusions. Basically, if a larger object weighs the same as a smaller object, the larger (less dense) object also *feels lighter*. As long as you get to look at it first.

          8 proslijeđenih tweetova 71 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        11. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Remember, the two objects weigh the same. And you can lift them the same way - by a handle on a string, say - and the bigger looking one still FEELS lighter.

          1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 50 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        12. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Other bullshit insane effects include: - Lighter color feels lighter - More metallic feels lighter - Colder feels heavierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00221-014-3926-9 …

          1 reply 8 proslijeđenih tweetova 104 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        13. James Wu‏ @analogist_net 4. srp 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          A lot of this is from how the brain weighs (heh) prior experience. A lot of work has been done in trying to figure out how experience is used - but the short story is that through extensive training you can be tricked into thinking the reverse too, that smaller feels heavier.

          6 replies 3 proslijeđena tweeta 79 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        14. Kraj razgovora

      Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

      Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

        Sponzorirani tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • O Twitteru
        • Centar za pomoć
        • Uvjeti
        • Pravila o privatnosti
        • Imprint
        • Kolačići
        • Informacije o oglasima