Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @amyxzh

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @amyxzh

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    19. stu 2019.

    Hi all! Please RT! I am recruiting PhD students ! My new lab will be reimagining online social and collaborative systems to empower people and improve society. Topics not limited to: collaboration & knowledge management, community resilience, info ecosystems, user agency

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 16 sati

    Our next amazing talk is just one week away. Register here to attend (Dr. Amy Zhang's) talk on "Systems to Improve Online Discussion" on 02/11/2019 at IBM, Cambridge:

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 18 sati

    Just out, and very timely: "Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform Governance", a paper by Jenny Fan & . Interesting questions and proposals to consider and contrast with the model.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    *NEW PAPER* in which & I introduce AI-MC: AI's increasingly central role in human communication (from smart replies to deep fakes) and how this trend may impact our language *and* our interpersonal relations, including how we trust each other 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    does this count as "personal news"? i'm ready to share more about how i came to be working on (tl;dr getting a lot of online abuse) and we're taking beta testers now! sign up for the waitlist and/or subscribe to our newsletter :)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Very interesting paper with empirical work on the use of juries in platform and content moderation by Jenny Fan &

    Poništi
  7. 28. sij

    A real problem that could be fixed with better tools. Not enough to screenshot or download data (can be faked). Instead, you could mark it on the platform when you encounter it, so it is preserved but also hidden from view. Better yet, allow friends to help you a la

    Poništi
  8. 28. sij

    We conclude with ideas on how to design data science tools with collaboration in mind, including easier ways to record code and data provenance, improving transparency of decision-making, and overall involving more non-technical and indirect stakeholders.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 28. sij

    - lower usage of documentation & discussion tools during feature engineering and bias mitigation stages - overall low rates of data documentation - differences in documentation + code reading/re-use practices based on tooling (GitHub vs Jupyter vs scripts)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 28. sij

    We find: - extensive collaboration across all stages of a data science workflow - but fewer collaborations with non-technical workers during important middle stages, such as feature engineering - bias detection and mitigation primarily a technical matter

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 28. sij

    We examine how different roles collaborate with each other, and at different stages in the data science workflow. We also consider tool usage over the course of a project, particularly as it relates to code/data documentation and re-use practices.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 28. sij

    📢New paper at with Michael Muller and Dakuo Wang on "How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Tools". We conduct a survey of industry data science/ML workers (technical and non-technical) to understand how they collaborate.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    will be speaking at our next meeting on "Systems to Improve Online Discussion". If you are interested in social computing, this is a must-attend talk! Register here:

    Poništi
  14. 27. sij

    Excited to head back to Boston in two weeks and give this talk to the BostonCHI community! Stop by IBM in Cambridge if you're around :)

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Could a jury-style system work where current approaches to online content moderation and governance have failed? That's the question posed in this new paper from academics at Harvard and the University of Washington

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    1/5 Today, the News Provenance Project is sharing insights from the UX research it has done to find out if surfacing metadata on news photos would help people to better discern credible images from misinformation. An overview of what we learned

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    This is fantastic work, just the curiosity and democratic principle in both your minds that led to your investigating this line for platform governance. Congratulations and . T/h

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    This work is some of the smartest interesting work I saw last year. Can’t recommend it highly enough.

    Poništi
  20. 23. sij

    Excited to see this preprint out! Read on if you're thinking about platform governance and ways social media could be democratically governed, with civic involvement by citizen-users. We examine civil juries and design and pilot a jury process for content moderation ➡️

    Poništi
  21. 23. sij

    It’s been said before but a lot of the failure of decentralized social networks in the past (like FOAF) can be traced back to problems rooted in the lack of attention to HCI: accessibility and UX for all and solving for real user needs.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·