PLEASE stand up against him and tell us what else we can do to help... besides trust in you & Tina...
-
-
-
That’s no candidate, that’s my Senator!pic.twitter.com/0iypN6vdYH
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I’m glad you put “AG” like this. Installing Whitaker is a slap in the face of every American waiting for a hint of integrity from this administration.
#ProtectMueller -
Imagine what it feel like for career ptofessional in the DOJ.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is the federalist society line - yes they are that crazy and must not be anywhere near our legal system
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You. 2020.
-
Agreed!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whitaker is not well respected anywhere but in the underworld. He is and has always been a lawyer in name only. Saying he is a partisan hack is to elevate him. Sessions was a racist hack who had the decency to recuse himself. Whitaker is worse than Sessions.
#HowLowCan45Go#VeryThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
... why we march Thank you, Senator for being a voice of reason.pic.twitter.com/bwowa9XfZ2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please run in 2020!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
Oh, by the way, congratulations on the victory. You can be my senator forever. You keep up the educational tweets and so will I . Former civics, history, and economics teacher. Minnesota proud.
-
Agreed. How can we keep her forever?!?
-
No term limits in senate. She hasn’t aged a day in 12 years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If anyone starts with taking issue with Marbury v. Madison, they should be dismissed out of hand. But for an “AG” to have taken that position? Yikes.
-
Strongly disagree with the premise. Judicial review only works if judges are beyond politics, otherwise, it's just an antidemocratic partisan institution.
-
Due to twitter constraints, it’s not clear to me the premise you are rejecting. The finality is judicial review is limited to the constitutional parameters. The court has long been, and usually is, a democratic authority. It has also been and is a partisan body.
-
The premise that people against judicial review should be dismissed out of hand. He may be against it for bad reasons, but it isn’t unambiguously good.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
