Whether they did or not you raise a great point that it would simply be that easy
-
-
Replying to @Singularitybook @razibkhan
Not that easy. How turn sperm or blood dna into something that looks like a spit sample?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Genomic DNA would all look the same, regardless of the source.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Would it? Don’t they have prep steps?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The DNA sequence you get out would be the same. The prep would be different.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What happens when you do spit prep to pure genomic dna? And if you previously amplified it would that screw up the subsequent amplification?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @antonioregalado @evolscientist and
So the DA statement makes it sound like a public database. Could it also be just Y chromosome match?https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/04/26/us/golden-state-killer.html …
3 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Graham_Coop @evolscientist and
Yes. Also pointed out elsewhere in this tangled thread. There is apparently a y matching database
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @antonioregalado @Graham_Coop and
here's what I can't figure out....if the police did this without the company's buy-in, then that violates ToS and would surely risk the DNA evidence being thrown out if it ever went to court... maybe in this case that was a risk they were willing to take
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @virginiahughes @antonioregalado and
So here are public databases they could have compared to, they're smaller and usually focused on specific markers e.g. Y chromosome. But would raise fewer ethical issues and be a easier practical route (if yes likely to work)
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
My guess is Y-STR typing + one of the publicly searchable services here: https://isogg.org/wiki/DNA_databases#Y-DNA_databases …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.