And if you would like interpretation of the court go read up on the Facebook lawsuit concerning CDA 230.
-
-
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
Strawman. I want you to prove what you're saying isnt total bullshit
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @_samjack_ and
A lawsuit isn't settled law. It's quite simple
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
You’re an idiot. There wasn’t only one lawsuit involving the interpretation of CDA involving Facebook.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
You realise a lawsuit isn't the same as established law right? Tell me you understand the difference
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
Wow someone failed senior history. If you don’t mind me asking what grade are you in?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
so to be clear you think a lawsuit is the same as the law?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
No. When cases of that caliber go up to the Supreme Court and a decision is made that case will be used on other decisions in the future. For example Roe v. Wade.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
so why are you bringing up ongoing cases as evidence of anything...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
Holy shit you’re fucking dumb. Do you have short term memory loss?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
you've just conceded that ongoing cases aren't precedent. at least you tried to make a vapid argument I guess?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.