Great where in 230 does it say that. Thanks!
-
-
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
So you want me to show you a part in 230 so then we can argue the interpretation and whether it would apply or not. Let’s be honest you don’t care about that you just want conservative voices censored.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @amilh and
And if you would like interpretation of the court go read up on the Facebook lawsuit concerning CDA 230.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
Strawman. I want you to prove what you're saying isnt total bullshit
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @_samjack_ and
A lawsuit isn't settled law. It's quite simple
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
You’re an idiot. There wasn’t only one lawsuit involving the interpretation of CDA involving Facebook.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
You realise a lawsuit isn't the same as established law right? Tell me you understand the difference
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
Wow someone failed senior history. If you don’t mind me asking what grade are you in?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
so to be clear you think a lawsuit is the same as the law?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
No. When cases of that caliber go up to the Supreme Court and a decision is made that case will be used on other decisions in the future. For example Roe v. Wade.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
so why are you bringing up ongoing cases as evidence of anything...
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.