you're not entitled to use a private company's services
actually, the laws exist *because* they dumped the toxic waste. but what laws are you suggesting?
-
-
1) its a hard question because at the heart of it is what kind of persuasion should be disincentivized/made illegal? Breitbart is conservative, they create content of that bent, it persuades people to think a certain way. But there's nothing wrong, per se, or illegal about it.
-
2) i think about stuff like if a hypnotist made me walk off a cliff are they charged with murder. If the kind of manipulation we are discussing could be shown as being exact enough to predictively deliver outcomes, in an election say, it's a kind of override of choice/free will.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.