There were 54 questions in the survey—she disliked one. There were two survivors quoted in her article. I personally met with both of them and personally examined the evidence in each of their cases. Mind you my office has around 5,000 open cases at any given time.
Here's an entire article from 2019 that lays out the whole situation at Starr King. Starr King and Aptos are joined at the hip.https://sfbayview.com/2019/09/starr-king-elementary-segregation-and-wealth-the-politics-of-liberal-san-franciscos-separate-but-equal/ …
-
-
But you wrote that SFBayView byline. We can’t control what the media writes. I commend
@hknightsf for her credible reporting. If her piece didn’t go in a direction that you wanted it to go, you are welcome to pitch her. What’s important is she was factual. -
Ignoring data relevant to a story is irresponsible.
@hknightsf's story questions why the school has no $ for mental health services and provides little info.@sfbayview spells out that exact issue. A few of us wrote to@hknightsf over a year ago, she had the data and ignored it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.