Many of my software design sensibilities are aesthetic. They have rational descriptions, but they're visceral reactions. Unfortunately, nobody who you're wishing this about is at all inclined. Moralizing is about embiggening your argument, and "aesthetic" here does the opposite.
-
-
-
you're not wrong, but my tentative working hypothesis is that this observation is itself part of the vicious moralization cycle. when ppl in effect forced to choose btw mundane explanations or moral ones (and impoverish concepts/language around what we're calling aesthetics)...
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I’m unsure how many even use these concepts, let along grapple w admitting the difference.
-
going to poll every client today and see what I learn
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They aren't necessarily different things
-
They are deeply related, but the modes of justification are different. An aesthetic framing makes salient the intractability of argument in many such cases right out of the gate.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I personally haven’t used the term aesthetic much but may suffer from it based on my rants. Are there signs we can use to tell the difference?
-
it's helpful to look at what behaviors you object to, specifically, and think about why that's usually clarifying for me anyway
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
if not, then real close. I think it's healthier and paradoxically more productive just to agree to disagree in that case. but morality looks more like an argumentative practice and sucks people into its vortex fruitlessly.
- Još 1 odgovor
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.