No, I'm not saying that exactly. Moral exhortation *is* a kind of coordination mechanism. (i.e. having the concept of "courage" is a pretty key element in getting soldiers not to flee!) I think things are bad enough that exhortation to trust your own judgment is necessary.
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @s_r_constantin @RokoMijicUK
Not sufficient of course.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @s_r_constantin
& you can test this with game theory experiments: get 100 anonymous strangers and make them play a many-person prisoner's dilemma. They will get the Nash equilibrium.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @RokoMijicUK @s_r_constantin
Most empirical work shows evolutionary sensitivity to: the value of cooperation, signal/noise ratios, the cost & griefing ratio of punishment, retaliatory abilities, the ability to watch others, metanorms (related to punishing non-punishers and rewarding cops), etc, etc...
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @almostlikethat @RokoMijicUK
"evolutionary sensitivity" means what here?
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @s_r_constantin @RokoMijicUK
You can simulate it and "(simulated) nature finds a way". I think that normal humans are pretty good at intuitively navigating a lot of these issues (because "social mammal") but bad at articulating descriptively and strategically correct theories (because science is hard).
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @almostlikethat @s_r_constantin
we're good at navigating them at scale ~= Dunbar number and under a "fixed pie" assumption where there's no economic growth, because that's a good approximation of most of our evolutionary history.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
IMO this mismatch between our game-theory instincts and the actual world we live in is the cause of many of our problems.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @RokoMijicUK @s_r_constantin
Yeah. If human groups stay F2F, family-sized, or village-sized (or similar to any of these) you generally get SOME kind of decent outcome with basically ZERO real theory. Also, scienticians are hard at work refining theories about what scales and why :-)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590188/ …
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @almostlikethat @s_r_constantin
"human groups stay F2F, family-sized, or village-sized ... get SOME kind of decent outcome with basically ZERO real theory." yes because that is our natural habitat and we have instinctive ways of making it work, like a fish in the water or a mountain goat on a steep slope.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
In subdunbar groups, doing normal human stuff, science says: "Trust your gut, human people!!" For everything else, there is mastercard... and an empirically grounded theoretical literature with some counter-intuitive results ;-)pic.twitter.com/FEoRZTtP6m
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @almostlikethat @s_r_constantin
The upgrades needed to make humans work in large groups are more about ideas, cultures, traditions. Coming back to the original question, nobody has worked out how to make an institution or tradition that would allow just the "non-asshole" people to work together.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @RokoMijicUK @s_r_constantin
I think executive cadres have done this over and over for millennia, but the theories were partial, practical, and hard to reliably teach. With tech, "full" solutions might be possible, but many *technically* possible novel solutions seem likely to me to result in dystopias...
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa - Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.