Conversation

This Tweet is unavailable. Learn more

Does questioning what you're doing and why result in a better overall product? I would say yes.

Replying to

and

I've been in a mathematical philosophy course that was 50/50 stem/humanities and the difference was striking and very interesting

Replying to

and

the stem people were far more efficient at getting to the core of a matter and better at asking precise questions, but on the other hand

Replying to

and

the humanities people asked some of the more fuzzy questions that would never have occurred to the stems

Replying to

and

concrete example that happened: "what if we make this x > 1 [in this formalism that doesn't allow x to be 1 because it's a probability]"

Replying to

and

makes little sense to the informed mind, right? but also, questioning the formalism in the first place is important

Replying to

and

without the humanities people, the discussions would certainly have been less interesting and it'd have been a mostly math seminar

Replying to

and

without the stem people, it would've been mostly hot air

11:52 PM · Sep 15, 2017Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

so, bring these people together, neither is clearly superior and they have much to learn from each other

Dr. Andrew / Aure Schrock

Replying to

and

Get no argument from me! Sounds like the course I teach at UCLA. Interdisciplinary, 1/3 discussion, 2/3 hands-on pair coding.

Show replies