Dr. Andrew / Aure Schrock@aschrock·Sep 15, 2017Does questioning what you're doing and why result in a better overall product? I would say yes.1
'(·)@allgebrah·Sep 15, 2017Replying to @aschrock and @RevFuturesI've been in a mathematical philosophy course that was 50/50 stem/humanities and the difference was striking and very interesting1
'(·)@allgebrah·Sep 15, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @aschrock and @RevFuturesthe stem people were far more efficient at getting to the core of a matter and better at asking precise questions, but on the other hand1
'(·)@allgebrah·Sep 15, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @aschrock and @RevFuturesthe humanities people asked some of the more fuzzy questions that would never have occurred to the stems1
'(·)@allgebrah·Sep 15, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @aschrock and @RevFuturesconcrete example that happened: "what if we make this x > 1 [in this formalism that doesn't allow x to be 1 because it's a probability]"1
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @allgebrah @aschrock and @RevFuturesmakes little sense to the informed mind, right? but also, questioning the formalism in the first place is important11:46 PM · Sep 15, 2017·Twitter Web Client
'(·)@allgebrah·Sep 15, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @aschrock and @RevFutureswithout the humanities people, the discussions would certainly have been less interesting and it'd have been a mostly math seminar1
'(·)@allgebrah·Sep 15, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @aschrock and @RevFutureswithout the stem people, it would've been mostly hot air1