did they not have competent decompiler writers? admittedly this is what I failed on myself but my powerlevel was lower then
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
> many SWF features are not yet implemented. Tracking all the missing features is not a goal at this time
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peroxycarbonate @allgebrah1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @peroxycarbonate
swf != abc, swf is a file format from hell while abc is a bytecode embedded in a huge complicated struct embedded in swf
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @allgebrah
but yeah either way it looks like getting it to work reliably is a major piece of work so I agree on this
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @peroxycarbonate
actually it does, AS has the the same numerical semantics as JS so that's one source of overhead removed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
I didn't think HTML5 canvas supported the basic graphics operations that Flash did...?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peroxycarbonate @allgebrah
JS doesn't seem like the hard part, there are plenty of transpilers and interpreters and so on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peroxycarbonate
both are based on 2D vector graphics; however I didn't work on that part so there may be important subtle differences
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
last I really looked (2012), as-to-js translation was universally awful and usually implemented as translate-as-you-go w/ shotgun parsing
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
since then I haven't worked on it so I'm accordingly rusty
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.