Conversation

This Tweet is unavailable. Learn more

Replying to

and

I'm not sure where I stand on this, but g seems to me to be the skill of generalizing, not raw processing power.

Replying to

and

Tasks like Chess have no built-in circuitry, so probably the brain reuses some wildly different circuitry and leans on g for that.

Replying to

and

Chess and other easily automated tasks are g-reliant, but the inverse doesn't necessarily hold - g-reliant doesn't mean "easily automated"?

Replying to

and

"human social interactions are incredibly complex", yet tinder bots work

Replying to

and

actually, really good chess players do grow dedicated circuitry - what if every task that can be pushed into subconscious can be automated

Show replies