Conversation
a thing with the Hutter definition is, stronger muscles also make you more effective at some tasks, so they make you more intelligent?
1
3
I mean, maybe that's even the right way of thinking about these things (embodied cognition etc), but it's counterintuitive
also, regarding free lunches:
Quote Tweet
strong no free lunch theorem: there's always a tradeoff
weak no free lunch theorem: statistically, you'll run into a tradeoff
Show this thread
1
1
(this is also definitely true, I just think the tradeoffs humans are made of are way worse than what intentional search can eventually find)
True! But I'm ok with unconventional definitions in this context, conventional ones probably make us focus on human-like cognition too much
1
1
while the thing that matters is competence which could include traditional intelligence but also more generally getting stuff done ofc
1
1
Show replies