I've almost completely rethought my views on animal cognition after trying to observe our cat as a fundamentally rational agent
-
-
Replying to @whitequark
mammals at least. Invertebrata are mostly hardwired even if they can learn (C. elegans can, with 302 neurons!), dunno about other vertebrata
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @whitequark
I'm being correctly told that existence of crows and octopuses complicates things a lot
2 replies 2 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @whitequark
theory: rational problem solving is comparatively *easy* compared to most of what our brain does and can be done with a much smaller brain
5 replies 3 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna
countertheory: rational problem solving is one aspect of cognition that is emphasized in species or individuals when there's pressure for it
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @whitequark
yes, exactly. it's only something that is optimized for when it's necessary. *when optimized for*, it does not require much computation mass
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna @whitequark
further hypothesis: imagine a human-like intelligence specifically designed to not have infrastructure for maintaining/using a body
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna @whitequark
e.g. EVE Online pod pilot, etc. someone who can think and communicate, but does not need to use arms.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna @whitequark
i would hypothesize that you could make such a brain 10x smaller without making that person less intelligent.
4 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
yes - although the documented case that comes to mind works in a different direction http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.