'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @puellavulnerataif you're not working on eradicating death, accepting it is still a good idea though51
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataThere is a difference between stoicism and complacency, though. Either way, acceptance doesn't lead to funding.11
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @nerdworldorder and @puellavulneratathat's why I added the "if" - complacent would be to accept it unconditionally2
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @nerdworldorder and @puellavulneratabut if your path in life doesn't involve working towards life extension, why not self-modify for less pain3
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataBTW, note structural similarities of this discussion to ones around accommodating vs. fighting injustice.2
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @nerdworldorder and @puellavulnerataand similarly to fighting injustice, one tends to run into diminishing returns with more self-policing6:30 PM · Feb 19, 2017·Twitter Web Client
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataNote that under discussion was idea of *adopting* comforting beliefs rather than making an effort to drop them.11
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @nerdworldorder @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataAnyway, in such "the first taste is free" scenarios, the returns on self-policing don't really diminish much.