'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @puellavulnerataif you're not working on eradicating death, accepting it is still a good idea though51
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataThere is a difference between stoicism and complacency, though. Either way, acceptance doesn't lead to funding.11
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @nerdworldorder and @puellavulneratathat's why I added the "if" - complacent would be to accept it unconditionally2
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataBe that as it may, acceptance still doesn't lead to more funding for anti-senescence, & actively undermines it.11
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @nerdworldorder and @puellavulneratayes - basically, if I have a way of getting to terms with death, I shouldn't share it3:20 PM · Feb 19, 2017·Twitter Web Client
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataFar be it from me to limit your speech. I am just not going to agree that acceptance has no costs attached.1
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @nerdworldorder and @puellavulnerataI agree! It's just that I can lower the cost by not talking about it (in practice I will though)1