that's why I added the "if" - complacent would be to accept it unconditionally
-
-
but if your path in life doesn't involve working towards life extension, why not self-modify for less pain
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @nerdworldorder
in that case - are you working on cures for aging right now
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @nerdworldorder
so I suppose it's safe to say you chose another path (because one has limited time per day)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
which is totally fine as a choice, even if you're against aging, because other needs may outweigh
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but once that choice is taken, imo it's ok to self-modify because it can't mess with the decision anymore
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
which is to say, avoiding pain and doing the good thing are compatible
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
note that I relaxed the constraint here - from epistemic integrity to moral integrity
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I have an intuition that full epistemic integrity is madness but I'm still somewhat uncertain about that
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.