Conversation

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

@puellavulnerata

if you're not working on eradicating death, accepting it is still a good idea though

Replying to

and

There is a difference between stoicism and complacency, though. Either way, acceptance doesn't lead to funding.

Replying to

and

that's why I added the "if" - complacent would be to accept it unconditionally

Replying to

and

but if your path in life doesn't involve working towards life extension, why not self-modify for less pain

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

and

in that case - are you working on cures for aging right now

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

and

so I suppose it's safe to say you chose another path (because one has limited time per day)

Replying to

and

which is totally fine as a choice, even if you're against aging, because other needs may outweigh

Replying to

and

but once that choice is taken, imo it's ok to self-modify because it can't mess with the decision anymore

2:14 PM · Feb 19, 2017Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

which is to say, avoiding pain and doing the good thing are compatible

Replying to

and

note that I relaxed the constraint here - from epistemic integrity to moral integrity

Show replies

Replying to

and

That is only assuming that the decision is one-time and that such a belief does not impact any other decisions.

Replying to

and

exactly (screenshot is related notes from the alt)

Show replies