'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @puellavulnerataif you're not working on eradicating death, accepting it is still a good idea though51
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataThere is a difference between stoicism and complacency, though. Either way, acceptance doesn't lead to funding.11
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @nerdworldorder and @puellavulneratathat's why I added the "if" - complacent would be to accept it unconditionally2
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @nerdworldorder and @puellavulneratabut if your path in life doesn't involve working towards life extension, why not self-modify for less pain3
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @puellavulnerata and @nerdworldorderin that case - are you working on cures for aging right now2
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @puellavulnerata and @nerdworldorderso I suppose it's safe to say you chose another path (because one has limited time per day)1
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @allgebrah @puellavulnerata and @nerdworldorderwhich is totally fine as a choice, even if you're against aging, because other needs may outweigh2:11 PM · Feb 19, 2017·Twitter Web Client
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @puellavulnerata and @nerdworldorderbut once that choice is taken, imo it's ok to self-modify because it can't mess with the decision anymore31
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah @puellavulnerata and @nerdworldorderwhich is to say, avoiding pain and doing the good thing are compatible1