'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @puellavulnerataif you're not working on eradicating death, accepting it is still a good idea though12:58 PM · Feb 19, 2017·Twitter Web Client1 Like
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulneratain case immortality comes you can still abjure, in case it doesn't, less fretting over it
Catherine@whitequark·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataI'm baffled by the idea that we'll eradicate death at best, we'll eradicate aging and age-related death22
Catherine@whitequark·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @whitequark @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataI guess this only highlights the absurdity of these death-love essays
Michael R. Bernstein@nerdworldorder·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @allgebrah and @puellavulnerataThere is a difference between stoicism and complacency, though. Either way, acceptance doesn't lead to funding.11
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 19, 2017Replying to @nerdworldorder and @puellavulneratathat's why I added the "if" - complacent would be to accept it unconditionally2
'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 20, 2017Replying to @Plinztuberculosis is easier to fix than aging, the easier sth is to fix, the less one should accept it @puellavulnerata