Conversation

Replying to

and

assuming it is a being of pure logic specified precisely by the problem statement and it has no decision tree for those outcomes

Replying to

and

since the paradox was written in 1969 it is possible if we are in the same universe with a predictor we are indeed in 70s sci fi

Replying to

"no, your stepfather is dead. your actual father is the only one who ever beat me, he has retired and is now fishing for salmon"

Replying to

and

wow this was much more obscure than I thought books.google.com/books?id=g195n

Replying to

nice

Replying to

and

i was considering responding with THERE IS NO SANCTUARRYYYYYY but then decided that wasn't obscure *enough*

Replying to

I profess lack of knowledge, where is that from?

Replying to

ah! well, you now know the ending of a movie, but not which movie.

Replying to

and

but if you want the forbidden SPOILERS knowledge type this into rot13.com : ybtnaf eha

Replying to

and

not sure if this movie is better or worse if you know ahead of time that there is no sanctuary.

'(·)

@allgebrah

Replying to

@mcclure111

interesting, I was completely unaware of that movie

12:05 AM · Nov 11, 2016Twitter Web Client

Replying to

the thing that is interesting to me about it is that it is a dystopia film where they did lots of utopia research in the design

Replying to

and

like, the public transit system depicted is legitimately amazing and is from a utopian proposal by an architect from the 50s

Show replies