'(·)@allgebrah·Nov 10, 2016did you know there's a sufficient, probably complete simulacrum of you inside a newcomb predictor? HANG ON WE'LL GET YOU OUT OF THERE4323
mcc@mcclure111·Nov 10, 2016Replying to @allgebrahI'm looking at the description of the Newcomb paradox & don't understand why "take box A and storm out" isn't a considered option11
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @mcclure111purely formally, you could choose A+B for an at least equally good outcome11:05 PM · Nov 10, 2016·Twitter Web Client
'(·)@allgebrah·Nov 10, 2016Replying to @allgebrah and @mcclure111I was thinking though, maybe you could coax computation worth more than $1M out of the predictor21
mcc@mcclure111·Nov 10, 2016Replying to @allgebrahso the only reason to pick A over A+B is if it really, really pisses you off to be fucked with by a godlike entity1
mcc@mcclure111·Nov 10, 2016Replying to @mcclure111 and @allgebrahand you wish to communicate you refuse to participate. The equivalent of flipping the predictor off11