Catherine@whitequark·Oct 3, 2016Replying to @muninit seems moderately likely that this is misbehaving antispam (e.g. what happened to @allgebrah). also likely that they hide...21
Catherine@whitequark·Oct 3, 2016Replying to @whitequark and @muninpolitically motivated bans under the guise of antispam. or that their antispam filter learned itself to be p. motivated.12
Catherine@whitequark·Oct 3, 2016Replying to @whitequark and @muninreally, shadowbanning as an antispam measure is indefensible; spamassassin is almost entirely transparent and it works excellent13
'(·)@allgebrah·Oct 3, 2016Replying to @whitequark and @muninit really depends on the adversary - when spammers evolve instead of moving on, you'll want to keep your methods secret2
'(·)@allgebrah·Oct 3, 2016Replying to @allgebrah @whitequark and @muninalso shadowbans are a decent enough antispam measure - but not a good community policing tool1
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @allgebrah @whitequark and @muningiving your moderators tools meant for antispam is like giving cops military gear - can be used responsibly, usually not10:47 PM · Oct 3, 2016·Twitter Web Client2 Likes