This Tweet is unavailable.
1
1
Conversation
Replying to
not sure I get it right bc I have cached thoughts on this, but I like that you can formulate it as <statement> under <reality>
1
2
which, interestingly, from the POV of the statement, makes subjunctive realities indistinguishable from "real" ones
1
1
2
for some classes of ontologies, this gets rid of grounding: nothing needs to "confer" reality, anything you can imagine exists
2
2
ofc you could construct a statement that only works in "real" realities, whatever that is, but I haven't tried that yet