idea: as long as throwing more neurons at a problem to solve it is cheap, a mind is disincentivized from figuring out higher-level structure
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
a smaller brain will need more insight to solve the same problem, a larger brain may "understand" less
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
a similar idea is in complexity theory (runtime of an algorithm vs its description size), but doesn't deal in incentives
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
how do you figure out, at a glance, whether to optimize or to bruteforce - is there an optimal way to do this?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
nah, still too obvious a question, probably answered in some paper about impl-ing Prolog; meta: quicker to figure out or to find the paper?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
had similar thoughts when alpha go won. I think practically brute force & understanding are not distinct activities.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
why abolish a useful distinction though? knowledge about the structure of a problem can drastically narrow the search space
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.