consider architecture on the web: a place (website) presents very little surface to the outside, but is much larger on the inside
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
it's twitter's frontpage vs everything that happens on it; the "walls" of any social site are plastered with profiles, virtual skins
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
isn't that some building that covers its walls with the skins of its inhabitants "soylent green is people" doesn't even begin to describe it
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
many traditional rules of architecture don't apply - w/out bodies, who needs buildings? but some sort of space does emerge from our movement
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
I've thought before that you could apply the original, purely materialist/geographical concept of Ley Lines to cyberspace.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MorganHay
Cyberspace as is is completely man made, but what about when it's old enough that parts have completely lost their meaning?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Right now, we don't have natural features like rivers, but it may happen
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.