'(·) on Twitter: "@Plinz if I read https://t.co/xaC3gxRibw right (too brainfried to read the original source atm), they only showed necessity, not sufficience" / Twitter

Some good points here, but anyone calling for a "metaphor-free theory" doesn't understand what a theory is aeon.co/essays/your-br

4

6

Replying to

This was actually really infuriating to read.

3

2

Replying to

yeah, it's especially bad because he gets a few things slightly right but then most of everything else completely wrong

3

Replying to

and

"several scientists [say] that specific memories are somehow stored in individual neurons" wut

1

Replying to

Maybe these things extremetech.com/extreme/218730 @The_Lagrangian

1

Replying to

that seems to be more about a certain class of neurons and less about 1:1 correspondence between specific neurons and memories?

1

Replying to

there is a link in the article to another one talking about specific neurons

1

Replying to

yes, but that one still talked about a group of neurons also they didn't show these were the only neurons encoding that memory

2

Replying to

and

if I read extremetech.com/extreme/123485 right (too brainfried to read the original source atm), they only showed necessity, not sufficience

11:12 PM · May 20, 2016Twitter Web Client

Replying to

brainfried? who knows, perhaps it is just this single crucial neuron... you should not have had that beer yesterday

1

Replying to

limited attention span/control and arxiv.org/abs/0709.3131 was pretty demanding (see thread)

Quote Tweet

'(·)

@allgebrah

May 20, 2016

Replying to @allgebrah and @insurrealist

first impression: the math looks reasonably simple but not all that easy, to play with it would still be a lot of effort

1

Conversation