@allgebrah not really. i mean, 2d embedding itself *already* doesn't scale, but it sort of passes if you suffer just enough
-
-
Replying to @whitequark
@allgebrah have you seen anything nontrivial in labview?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @whitequark
@whitequark briefly and it gave me a few ideas about how to do higher order programming in something labview-like1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah you can sort of do higher-order in graph repro, but you're working against your medium1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @whitequark
@allgebrah having to do a 2d embedding artificially limits the range of abstractions you can use and i don't find that compelling2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @whitequark
@whitequark my (untested) approach to that is: have several planes, turn your diagram "on the side" to work in another plane2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY IN ONLY 24 HOUR ROTATION1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @whitequark
@whitequark well it does solve the embedding problem (theoretically, for finite dimensions) what I do not know: is it practical to design in2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah I'd be curious about it but I'm nearly convinced that it would be an absolute nightmare to use1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @whitequark
@whitequark I shall notify you if something comes of my notes! (stepping stone project: graphical notation for haskell)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@whitequark people like conal elliott have worked on this, I read some papers and thought "what a curious lack of imagination"
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
@whitequark but maybe they have just already tested all these ideas and found them to be bad. idk.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.