@The_Lagrangian you can even shuffle the execution steps around arbitrarily as long as the computation's internal arrow of time is preserved
Conversation
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian Shuffling execution steps can naively only be done after generating something to shuffle.
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian It seems as if the causal structure of computation is the computation, not the, uh, specific bits I suppose.
1
2
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian Yeah, sending a sim over the net preserves causality, dust hypothesis does not.
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian Having every permutation is different from running every computation if we require causal structure
1
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian actually the causal structure is perfectly well preserved (when seen from the inside)
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian What if there isn't an inside when there's not an appropriate causal structure? That's my claim.
2
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian thought experiment: take a machine with finite states, the computation is a path through these
1
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian step 1: compute a few (or a lot) of these transitions
step 2: compute one
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian now take [2] and one transition from [1] so that "[2], then [1]" is causally coherent
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian all under the assumption that you somehow need to "physically realize" a computation
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian this is shuffling the computation in outside causality while inner causality is preserved
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian I don't get what this bit means. twitter.com/allgebrah/stat & maybe too simple to have an inside view
Quote Tweet
Replying to @allgebrah
@ProofOfLogic @AlleleOfGene @The_Lagrangian now take [2] and one transition from [1] so that "[2], then [1]" is causally coherent
2
1
Show replies