I am more concerned nowadays on focusing only on models of the world that explain future experience
Conversation
Replying to
as mentioned, Tegmarkian thought explains everything, therefore nothing- it does have a side benefit of...
1
1
Replying to
...dissolving questions of existence *beyond* specifying a model that predicts experience though
1
1
Replying to
oh also that evidence of psych/neuro reasons for math make math as "reality" seem less likely
2
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian disagree. Those arguments explain why we formulate math in terms of arithmetic or sets...
1
2
Replying to
1
2
Replying to
but there's little reason to believe platonic "math" exist beyond human constructions of it
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian that same argument applies but is often shot down when regarding subjective experience of nature
2
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian he *attempts* to argue it is independent of the historical artifacts of human study of math
1
1
Replying to
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian with whom :)
also I addressed much of this subthread in my side-rant
Quote Tweet
Replying to @allgebrah
@The_Lagrangian @lumenphosphor there would be no structure left, the structure is purely an artifact of our minds
Replying to
1
Replying to
@The_Lagrangian and I think of human math like a local region of platonic realm, like a local region of a fractal
2