A theory of aesthetics should explain why I like the things I like, but cannot claim that I *should* like something, as this is arbitrary.
Conversation
Replying to
If a theory claims I should like something that I don't in fact like, or vice versa, then the theory fails to correspond to reality.
1
1
1
Replying to
Aesthetics is, and can only be, a post facto explanation of preferences which already exist.
2
4
Replying to
what if I have preferences about my preferences, i.e. I want to like something because it makes the self more elegant?
1
3
Replying to
What if one believes they should like X, but can not actually enjoy X no matter how hard they try?
3
1
Replying to
some are irreconcilable without meta: let's say I love the taste of meat but am ethically absolutely opposed to eating it
1
1
Replying to
I'd say that you still love the taste of meat aesthetically, and your ethical stance against it doesn't change that
2
1
2
Replying to
the distinction between having a preference and acting on it