Conversation
Replying to
@_100101890 @InfiniteSynths what do you need to study to even begin to understand this?
2
2
Replying to
@_100101890 easy in principle: these are thought forms, but not language (they don't parse back unambiguously)
Replying to
@_100101890 you 'only' need to emulate the way of thinking that leads to these (which is hard given insufficient information)
3
1
3
Replying to
For all its surface obscurity, I reckon I can sympathise with the state of mind that gets @_100101890 here. :)