JJM Rowdy@UNDICTION·Mar 9, 2016vampires:have their own blood22.8%have other people's blood34.2%do not have any blood43%114 votes·Final results52
'(·)@allgebrah·Mar 10, 2016Replying to @UNDICTION@UNDICTION well this is all presupposing they're blood vampires and not some other kind (shameless plug)Quote Tweet'(·)@allgebrah·Feb 29, 2016The ontological vampire feeds on your specific qualities, leaving only an abstract husk. Freshly sated, it appears painfully hyperreal.12
'(·)@allgebrah·Mar 10, 2016Replying to @allgebrah@UNDICTION the generalized vampire sucks something out of the victim that it has a lot of, but that the vampire has a need for12
'(·)@allgebrah·Mar 10, 2016Replying to @allgebrah@UNDICTION this could be to replace its own lack of [quantity], or to digest it; the former are more mystical, the latter biological12
'(·)@allgebrahReplying to @allgebrah@UNDICTION a digesting vampire without any blood would be more on the mystical side if the kind of blood is required for biological function10:11 AM · Mar 10, 2016·Twitter Web Client1 Like