@allgebrah ..hm. where would you see that? An (eg. Amazon) ecosystem? Or metabolism/chemosynthesis-centric information hub like a human GMB?
-
-
Replying to @_______248190
@_100101890 definitely a(n eco)system, for example those wandering lichens could support a slimemold-like mode and a cellular turing mode
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@_100101890 or like in Lady of Mazes, a role playing game with rules so complex that a mind runs on them (w/o participants being aware)
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah original setting(/)backstory of The Matrix used that, as well, before everything-ruining thermodynamics got given the boot1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_______248190
@_100101890 Oh, that is official? I know an interpretation of the Matrix that works similarly, but I always thought it was fan made.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah I could totally be going off unconscious retcon/head-canon...not uncommon with me lol. (Or other lit fanboy/exfanficcers I think)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_______248190
@allgebrah which given the wish-fulfillment and memory-assimilation aspects, one is interestingly prompted to refer to Freud - the dream >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_______248190
@allgebrah > theory specifically, even? Fantasy fan-worlding as a (technically & neurally) ramified, stateful extended dreaming process?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_______248190
@_100101890 that's basic meme-/dreamtime physics actually memes are a prime example of "minds that run across" (orthogonally to) ours
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah when you say physics - is there formalism out there? also wondering after comp. neural signatures suggesting eg memory-uncoupling3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@_100101890 I don't know of any formalisms, with memes being part of the noosphere I'd say magic has more say in this than physics
-
-
Replying to @allgebrah
@allgebrah long been convinced that this ((magic/(-physics) =X), the unification problems & the bewildered interpretive cacophany around QM2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_______248190
@_100101890 it's more about a difference in method - science is great at finding a consensus reality, but minds cannot be part of consensus
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.